Abuja, Nigeria – The Nigerian Army has debunked allegations made by a dismissed soldier, Lance Corporal Rotimi Olamilekan, also known as “Soja Boi,” describing the claims as false and capable of misleading the public.
The Army, reacting to a widely circulated interview on social media and mainstream platforms, clarified that Olamilekan’s dismissal was not connected to expressing personal views, but was a result of repeated breaches of military discipline, including violations of the Armed Forces Social Media Policy.
It stated that his removal from service followed due process in accordance with the Armed Forces Act and extant regulations guiding the conduct of personnel. The Army noted that actions such as unauthorised media engagements, commercialisation of military identity, and misuse of uniform are serious infractions under military law.
Addressing concerns on welfare and pay, the Army maintained that it operates a transparent remuneration structure as outlined in the Manual of Financial Administration for the Armed Forces of Nigeria. It explained that personnel receive salaries based on rank and years of service, alongside allowances such as uniform allowance and other entitlements.
The statement added that troops deployed on operations benefit from additional provisions, including Ration Cash Allowance, Habit Allowance and free feeding, while those serving in theatres like Operation HADIN KAI receive operational allowances and other mission-related incentives.
The Army also dismissed claims that soldiers procure their own uniforms and protective equipment, stressing that such items are supplied through established logistics channels. It explained that ordnance units are responsible for the procurement and distribution of kits, arms, ammunition and protective gear to ensure personnel are adequately equipped.
While noting that some individuals may choose to acquire additional gear for personal convenience, the Army emphasised that this does not indicate any failure in its supply system.
It further rejected assertions that troops are deployed without protective equipment, insisting that all personnel are properly kitted before deployment. The claim that such equipment is only issued during official visits was described as baseless.
The Nigerian Army urged the public to disregard the allegations and avoid spreading unverified information, warning that such narratives could erode confidence in security institutions and affect ongoing operations.
Reaffirming its commitment to professionalism and troop welfare, the Army called for continued public support and responsible reporting by the media.
